<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>The Pakistan Policy Blog &#187; Scotland Yard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pakistanpolicy.com/category/agencies/scotland-yard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pakistanpolicy.com</link>
	<description>Analysis of Pakistan&#039;s domestic and foreign affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 07:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<copyright>2006-2007 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>arif.rafiq@gmail.com (The Pakistan Policy Blog)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>arif.rafiq@gmail.com (The Pakistan Policy Blog)</webMaster>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Commentary on and analysis of Pakistan's domestic and foreign affairs.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>The Pakistan Policy Blog</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>The Pakistan Policy Blog</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>arif.rafiq@gmail.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://pakistanpolicy.com/tppb_podcast_logo_small.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Scotland Yard Says Head Injury Killed Benazir Bhutto</title>
		<link>http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/02/08/scotland-yard-says-head-injury-killed-benazir-bhutto/</link>
		<comments>http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/02/08/scotland-yard-says-head-injury-killed-benazir-bhutto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arif Rafiq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benazir Bhutto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benazir Bhutto's Assassination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland Yard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/02/08/scotland-yard-says-head-injury-killed-benazir-bhutto/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The team from Scotland Yard investigating the assassination of Benazir Bhutto released their final report today. Its two major conclusions: head trauma caused by the bomb blast killed Benazir Bhutto and the suicide bomber and the gunman were the same person. The report states: &#8220;Ms Bhutto’s only apparent injury was a major trauma to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The team from Scotland Yard investigating the assassination of Benazir Bhutto released their <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/08_02_2008bhuttoreport.pdf">final report</a> today.  Its two major conclusions: head trauma caused by the bomb blast killed Benazir Bhutto and the suicide bomber and the gunman were the same person.</p>
<p>The report states:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Ms Bhutto’s only apparent injury was a major trauma to the right side of the head. The UK experts all exclude this injury being an entry or exit wound as a result of gunshot.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;the UK Home Office pathologist&#8230;<strong>is unable categorically to exclude the possibility of there being a gunshot wound to the upper trunk or neck</strong>. However&#8230;<strong>the available evidence <em>suggests </em>that there was no gunshot injury&#8230;.</strong>Dr Cary <strong>excludes the possibility of a bullet to the neck or upper trunk as being a relevant factor in the actual cause of death</strong>, when set against the nature and extent of her head injury.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Dr. Nathaniel Cary, the UK Home Office pathologist, is quoted as stating:</p>
<blockquote><p>“the only tenable cause for the rapidly fatal head injury in this case is that it occurred as the result of impact due to the effects of the bomb-blast.”</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>“in my opinion Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto died as a result of a severe head injury sustained as a consequence of the bomb-blast and due to head impact somewhere in the escape hatch of the vehicle.”</p>
<p>&#8220;All the available evidence points toward the person who fired shots and the person who detonated the explosives being one and the same person.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The report&#8217;s conclusions are unlikely to satisfy a considerable number of Pakistanis, and in particular, People&#8217;s Party leaders and supporters who strongly believe an assassin&#8217;s blow took Bhutto&#8217;s life.</p>
<p>Rehman Malik, Benazir Bhutto&#8217;s security chief, stated on GEO TV that Scotland Yard had a &#8220;limited mandate&#8221; and did not produce &#8220;a conclusive report.&#8221;  He seemed unprepared to deal with the report&#8217;s technical aspects, admitting that he did not read it in full, though he argued among the remaining questions is that of who financed the plot.   Sherry Rehman, a senior PPP spokesperson, also did not read the entire report but <a href="http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_2266925,00.html">maintained the party&#8217;s position that Bhutto died from an assassin&#8217;s blow</a>.</p>
<p>If the People&#8217;s Party continues in its rejection of the report&#8217;s findings, it will find difficulty gaining international and institutional credence if it cannot rebut them on a technical basis. Its call for a Hariri-like UN investigation has gone ignored and there is little will among the major global powers to concede to one.  Should the People&#8217;s Party come to power after the coming elections, it can perhaps obtain a rival third-party report.  Otherwise, Bhutto&#8217;s assassination will remain a passively contested issue.</p>
<p>The Scotland Yard report can be seen as a victory for the Musharraf government, which has contended that head trauma associated with the blast, not an assassin&#8217;s blow, killed Bhutto.  It will, however, not temper the skepticism of most Pakistanis toward the claims made by Musharraf and Britain, one of his Western benefactors.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/08_02_2008bhuttoreport.pdf">Full text of report</a>]</p>
<div class="printfriendly alignleft"><a href="http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/02/08/scotland-yard-says-head-injury-killed-benazir-bhutto/?pfstyle=wp" rel="nofollow" ><img src="//cdn.printfriendly.com/pf-button.gif" alt="Print Friendly" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/02/08/scotland-yard-says-head-injury-killed-benazir-bhutto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

