<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama and McCain Equally Mediocre on Pakistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/09/27/obama-and-mccain-equally-mediocre-on-pakistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/09/27/obama-and-mccain-equally-mediocre-on-pakistan/</link>
	<description>Analysis of Pakistan&#039;s domestic and foreign affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:06:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amarnath</title>
		<link>http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/09/27/obama-and-mccain-equally-mediocre-on-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-10630</link>
		<dc:creator>Amarnath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanpolicy.com/?p=886#comment-10630</guid>
		<description>i dont understand why did americans get sentimental and elect obama as their president,his policies may be civilian friendly but on a long term its not going to help.Obama is no doubt a good man but he makes emotional decisions which could have a adverse effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont understand why did americans get sentimental and elect obama as their president,his policies may be civilian friendly but on a long term its not going to help.Obama is no doubt a good man but he makes emotional decisions which could have a adverse effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahsan</title>
		<link>http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/09/27/obama-and-mccain-equally-mediocre-on-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-9023</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanpolicy.com/?p=886#comment-9023</guid>
		<description>PAKISTAN IS ON A PATH OF DISTRUCATION THATS WHAT THE U.S. AND ITS POPETS THE TALIBAN AND ALQIDA WANT:

Couldn&#039;t agree more. If there&#039;s one thing I can&#039;t stand, it&#039;s Westrin Popets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PAKISTAN IS ON A PATH OF DISTRUCATION THATS WHAT THE U.S. AND ITS POPETS THE TALIBAN AND ALQIDA WANT:</p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more. If there&#8217;s one thing I can&#8217;t stand, it&#8217;s Westrin Popets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAKISTAN IS ON A PATH OF DISTRUCATION THATS WHAT THE U.S AND ITS POPETS THE TALIBAN AND ALQIDA WANT</title>
		<link>http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/09/27/obama-and-mccain-equally-mediocre-on-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-9015</link>
		<dc:creator>PAKISTAN IS ON A PATH OF DISTRUCATION THATS WHAT THE U.S AND ITS POPETS THE TALIBAN AND ALQIDA WANT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 04:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanpolicy.com/?p=886#comment-9015</guid>
		<description>PAKISTANI PEPOLE SHOULD NOT TRUST THE SO CALLED PAKISTANI POLITICAL PARTYS AND THE PAKISTANI ARMY AND ALQIDA AND TALIBAN THEY ARE ALL WORKING AND GETING PAID BY THE THE U.S.A AND C.I.A ALSO THE U.S.A HAVE A EVIL AGENDA IN THE MUSLIM WORLD FOR THIS AGENDA TO WORK IT NEEDS POPETS AND TERRORISM WICH IS A FACT YOU CAN NOT TRUST THE U.S AND ALSO MORE MUSLIM HAVE BEEN KILLED IN THE HANDS OF U.S AND ALQIDA LEAD TERRORISM IN MUSLIM WORLD ALSO THE MUSLIM THEM SELF HAVE BEEN THE VICTIMS OF TERRORISM THE VERY SCOURGE OF TERRORISM CAME UPON THE MUSLIM WORLD BY THE WESTRIN U.S LED AGENDA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PAKISTANI PEPOLE SHOULD NOT TRUST THE SO CALLED PAKISTANI POLITICAL PARTYS AND THE PAKISTANI ARMY AND ALQIDA AND TALIBAN THEY ARE ALL WORKING AND GETING PAID BY THE THE U.S.A AND C.I.A ALSO THE U.S.A HAVE A EVIL AGENDA IN THE MUSLIM WORLD FOR THIS AGENDA TO WORK IT NEEDS POPETS AND TERRORISM WICH IS A FACT YOU CAN NOT TRUST THE U.S AND ALSO MORE MUSLIM HAVE BEEN KILLED IN THE HANDS OF U.S AND ALQIDA LEAD TERRORISM IN MUSLIM WORLD ALSO THE MUSLIM THEM SELF HAVE BEEN THE VICTIMS OF TERRORISM THE VERY SCOURGE OF TERRORISM CAME UPON THE MUSLIM WORLD BY THE WESTRIN U.S LED AGENDA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arif Rafiq</title>
		<link>http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/09/27/obama-and-mccain-equally-mediocre-on-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-7652</link>
		<dc:creator>Arif Rafiq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 02:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanpolicy.com/?p=886#comment-7652</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Aaron.  You&#039;re right about the centrality of Pakistan.  Too bad most have no idea what&#039;s going on.

-------------

A. Hummer, thanks for the jeremiad.  I will convey your blog comment to the 160 million people of Pakistan.

You make a valid point or two, but then I think you succumb to the lure of narrowing down Pakistan&#039;s political priorities to the single issue you care about.  Next, you reduce its political/security problems (and solutions) to a single variable, which I find naive if not disingenuous and self-serving.

That lack of complexity might apply to your local school board, work carpool, or children&#039;s disputes, but this is complex politics dealing with dozens of actors and tens of millions of people. 

Scour this blog&#039;s archives to get a sense of the complexity.  If that&#039;s too tough, then you might be out of your league.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Aaron.  You&#8217;re right about the centrality of Pakistan.  Too bad most have no idea what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>A. Hummer, thanks for the jeremiad.  I will convey your blog comment to the 160 million people of Pakistan.</p>
<p>You make a valid point or two, but then I think you succumb to the lure of narrowing down Pakistan&#8217;s political priorities to the single issue you care about.  Next, you reduce its political/security problems (and solutions) to a single variable, which I find naive if not disingenuous and self-serving.</p>
<p>That lack of complexity might apply to your local school board, work carpool, or children&#8217;s disputes, but this is complex politics dealing with dozens of actors and tens of millions of people. </p>
<p>Scour this blog&#8217;s archives to get a sense of the complexity.  If that&#8217;s too tough, then you might be out of your league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Hummer</title>
		<link>http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/09/27/obama-and-mccain-equally-mediocre-on-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-7585</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Hummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanpolicy.com/?p=886#comment-7585</guid>
		<description>Wake up Pakistan --it is no longer a question of being Pro or Anti-American.
Though past  US policies -- inspired or collaborated in by every  leader you have accepted for yourselves -- ARE responsible for the present situation, and should be criticised by citizens and historians, the future is up to you. If you do not deal with your own hate-mongering extremists and their jihad-exporting ways, you invite the world to do it for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wake up Pakistan &#8211;it is no longer a question of being Pro or Anti-American.<br />
Though past  US policies &#8212; inspired or collaborated in by every  leader you have accepted for yourselves &#8212; ARE responsible for the present situation, and should be criticised by citizens and historians, the future is up to you. If you do not deal with your own hate-mongering extremists and their jihad-exporting ways, you invite the world to do it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Was The Marriot Targeted? By Tariq Ali &#124; Prose Before Hos</title>
		<link>http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/09/27/obama-and-mccain-equally-mediocre-on-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-7495</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Was The Marriot Targeted? By Tariq Ali &#124; Prose Before Hos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanpolicy.com/?p=886#comment-7495</guid>
		<description>[...] See Also: Pakistan: Media propaganda, Palin Agrees with Obama on Pakistan, Refugees Flee Fighting, and Other Blunders, President of Pakistan (21 days only….and already target for murder), Pakistan Army Says 1,000 Militants Killed in 1 Month, Pakistans Faith in Its New Leader Is Shaken, and Obama and McCain Equally Mediocre on Pakistan. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See Also: Pakistan: Media propaganda, Palin Agrees with Obama on Pakistan, Refugees Flee Fighting, and Other Blunders, President of Pakistan (21 days only….and already target for murder), Pakistan Army Says 1,000 Militants Killed in 1 Month, Pakistans Faith in Its New Leader Is Shaken, and Obama and McCain Equally Mediocre on Pakistan. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr 10% meets the 27%ers up town &#171; Alternate Seat of TYR</title>
		<link>http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/09/27/obama-and-mccain-equally-mediocre-on-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-7465</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr 10% meets the 27%ers up town &#171; Alternate Seat of TYR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanpolicy.com/?p=886#comment-7465</guid>
		<description>[...] PPB says that it was getting there just before Musharraf&#8217;s coup and it&#8217;s only offensive to say so if you&#8217;re Nawaz Sharif. But that&#8217;s not the point; the problem is that the US is horribly likely to behave in Pakistan as in Somalia if the failed-state meme takes hold. And nothing makes states fail like the perception of state failure - it&#8217;s very like a bank in that sense. Nobody can afford this in a country with (as everyone, hackneyedly, clichedly says) nuclear weapons, with the Indian and Chinese dimensions, with the coast on the tanker routes, and the MSR to Afghanistan. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PPB says that it was getting there just before Musharraf&#8217;s coup and it&#8217;s only offensive to say so if you&#8217;re Nawaz Sharif. But that&#8217;s not the point; the problem is that the US is horribly likely to behave in Pakistan as in Somalia if the failed-state meme takes hold. And nothing makes states fail like the perception of state failure &#8211; it&#8217;s very like a bank in that sense. Nobody can afford this in a country with (as everyone, hackneyedly, clichedly says) nuclear weapons, with the Indian and Chinese dimensions, with the coast on the tanker routes, and the MSR to Afghanistan. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Mannes</title>
		<link>http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/09/27/obama-and-mccain-equally-mediocre-on-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-7463</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Mannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanpolicy.com/?p=886#comment-7463</guid>
		<description>Terrific blog, and I was sorry to see it off-line for much of the past week when so much was happening.

This round-up is dead on regarding the two candidates and their positions on Pakistan, although McCain&#039;s muff of Zardari&#039;s name doesn&#039;t seem substantial.

I blog at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterterrorismblog.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CTBlog&lt;/a&gt; and discuss Pakistan frequently.  Easy answers are in very short supply, but an effective Pakistan policy will be front and center on the next President&#039;s agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific blog, and I was sorry to see it off-line for much of the past week when so much was happening.</p>
<p>This round-up is dead on regarding the two candidates and their positions on Pakistan, although McCain&#8217;s muff of Zardari&#8217;s name doesn&#8217;t seem substantial.</p>
<p>I blog at the <a href="http://www.counterterrorismblog.org" rel="nofollow">CTBlog</a> and discuss Pakistan frequently.  Easy answers are in very short supply, but an effective Pakistan policy will be front and center on the next President&#8217;s agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online &#187; Pakistani Bloggers on the McCain-Obama Debate</title>
		<link>http://pakistanpolicy.com/2008/09/27/obama-and-mccain-equally-mediocre-on-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-7446</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online &#187; Pakistani Bloggers on the McCain-Obama Debate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistanpolicy.com/?p=886#comment-7446</guid>
		<description>[...] Pakistan Policy Blog argues extensively for and against both sides: OBAMA GOOD FOR CIVILIANS, BAD FOR MILITARY Obama’s support for Pakistan’s fledgling democracy and appropriation of the Biden plan, which calls for vastly increasing development aid, is excellent. It is an integral part of a transition toward a full-fledged Pakistan policy. But Obama seems unaware of the clear and present economic danger in Pakistan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pakistan Policy Blog argues extensively for and against both sides: OBAMA GOOD FOR CIVILIANS, BAD FOR MILITARY Obama’s support for Pakistan’s fledgling democracy and appropriation of the Biden plan, which calls for vastly increasing development aid, is excellent. It is an integral part of a transition toward a full-fledged Pakistan policy. But Obama seems unaware of the clear and present economic danger in Pakistan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

