IRI Poll: Nawaz on Top, Musharraf on Bottom; Pakistanis Want Judges and Jobs Back; PPP’s Leaderless Drift

Thursday, July 17th, 2008
By Arif Rafiq
Posted in Public Opinion |

Another poll of Pakistanis has been released. The irony is that Pakistani voices are being increasingly heard, but it stops right there.  There’s no actualization.

I forsee not only rising public anger, but also a very ugly end-product.  Those responsible–and there are many–will wash their hands, describing it all as inevitable.

The International Republican Institute published the findings of its latest survey, conducted in the first two weeks of June.

Links: Press Release; IRI Pakistan Index; Graphs and Charts

MAJOR FINDINGS:

  • Nawaz Sharif remains Pakistan’s most popular politician.  He has an 82% approval rating.
  • Next five most popular public figures are, respectively: A.Q. Khan, Iftikhar Chaudhry, Shahbaz Sharif, Yousuf Raza Gilani, and Bilawal Bhutto Zardari.  The first four are tied to Pakistan’s renewed nationalism.  Gilani is seen as a nice, pious fellow.  Bilawal carries the legacy of his slain mother.  There are no material expectations of him (and resultant disappointment) yet.  He’s just a kid.
  • Surprisingly, Aitzaz Ahsan’s negatives are high (40%).  I would tie this to his contentious relationship with the People’s Party.
  • Asif Zardari’s positives and negatives are not as high as Aitzaz’s.  There’s a much larger segment of people that are undecided about Zardari.  This is likely a product of a rollover of his status as Benazir’s widower as well as his swift and confusing political dancing.  However, as head of Pakistan’s largest party, Zardari’s positives are relatively low — especially when compared to Nawaz Sharif.  In the coming months, I expect the undecided camp to choose sides.  And I think today, a month after this poll was conducted, many Pakistanis have already.
  • Pervez Musharraf is Pakistan’s most disliked public figure — even more than Baitullah Mehsud, a prolific terrorist.  In fact, opposition to Musharraf has increased since November.  Now, approximately 85% of Pakistanis want him to resign.
  • Eight-six percent of Pakistanis see the country as going in the wrong direction.  Over 70% see themselves as worse off economically and less secure than before.
  • Fifty one percent deem the government’s performance negatively.  This will increase through the summer.  Still, 52% see the new government bringing positive change to the country.
  • Around 58% want the PPP-PML(N) governing coalition to stay together.  And most PPP voters are against a coalition with the PML(Q).
  • Seventy-one percent see inflation as the greatest problem facing Pakistan today.  Terrorism is at the bottom (though, in contrast to the January poll, there is no response for terrorism, but “Al Qaeda” and “suicide bombing.”)
  • Eighy-three percent want the deposed judges restored.  It’s very important for 69% of Pakistanis.
  • A strong majority supports talks with militants, but the public remains conflicted about the use of force and the challenge of terrorism.
  • Support for the U.S.-led war on terror increase from 9 to 15%.  Over 70% still oppose Pakistan’s participation.
  • Chief of Army Staff Gen. Ashfaq Kayani’s negative ratings have declined considerably to 11% (down from the 50s).  His approval rating is higher, now in the 30s.  That means the public is still seeking to find out who Kayani is.  He has mitigated negative sentiments toward him (perhaps inherited from Musharraf) and has an opportunity to secure public goodwill toward him.
  • A sizable plurality (38%) sees Nawaz Sharif as the person most fit to lead Pakistan.  He is slightly above his September 2007 high of 36%.  It seem as if there’s strong resistance near the 40% level — probably due to  the sizable PPP vote bank.  Strangely, Asif Zardari doesn’t appear to be on the list.  Either he was not included in the survey or few chose him.  If the latter is true, then PPP voters are divided.  The party faces a leadership void.  Their favor is split amongst four persons: a teenager (Bilawal), a deceased person (Benazir Bhutto), an outcasted party leader (Amin Fahim), and a fairly impotent prime minister (Yousuf Raza Gilani).
  • If fresh elections are held, the PML-N has the potential to win a majority in Punjab by itself and a plurality in NWFP.  The PPP is in a similar position in, respectively, Sindh and Balochistan.  But the PML-N, if it places the right candidates in the right seats, can come out well in all four provinces.  This is tied to the downfall of the PML-Q, the PPP’s self-destruction, and most importantly, the PML-N’s position on the deposed judges (80% have a higher opinion of the party because of its position).  In contrast, the PPP will lose out from not restoring the judges — at least nationally (over 70% say they will view the PPP more negatively).

CONCLUSIONS:

  • Pervez Musharraf is not rehabitable in terms of Pakistani public opinion.  He is indelibly tied to Pakistan’s comprehensive decline in the past few years (e.g. sovereignty, social equity, and law and order).  He can stay in power artificially — especially when half of the governing coalition is creeping on the down low with him.
  • The PPP has fragmented since the murder of Benazir Bhutto.  Yousuf Raza Gilani is seen positively, but PPP voters are split on who’s their best leader — Zardari, Bilawal, Gilani, or even Benazir.
  • In contrast, the PML-N has benefited from clarity on key issues and a consolidated party leadership.
  • Socio-economic and rule of law issues are not exclusive in the eyes of the public.  Pakistanis, in general, want both the deposed judges restored and economic relief.
  • Pakistanis remain highly conflicted about the war on terror.  They do not support terrorism, nor do they support the U.S.-led war on terror.  They favor peace talks with militants.  Terrorism hasn’t produced a hatred of terrorists, rather the wave of violence is blamed on Musharraf and the United States.  The continued presence of Musharraf and absence of real Afghan rapproachment provide a convenient cover for terrorists in Pakistan.
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Webnews
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “IRI Poll: Nawaz on Top, Musharraf on Bottom; Pakistanis Want Judges and Jobs Back; PPP’s Leaderless Drift”

  1. Arif
    thanks for this post and your analysis. It would have been great if you had commented on the sample size, the methodology of this survey.

    I am quite intrigued by these surveys and how they tell us about our country and what we think, like and dislike..
    A little Orientalist in approach…
    Maybe I am a bit too cynical :)

  2. The sample size and methodology can be found in the links to IRI’s website

    http://www.iri.org/mena/pakistan/pdfs/2008%20July%2017%20Survey%20of%20Pakistan%20Public%20Opinion,%20June%201-15,%202008.pdf

    Interviews were face to face, sample size is over 3000

  3. Arif Rafiq Says:

    Raza, you’re welcome. Tom’s link (thanks, Tom) has details on the survey background, which you’re more than welcome to look at and comment on.

    The survey seems fairly standard. Some critical comments from me:

    1) Perhaps men and literate individuals are somewhat over represented.
    2) Survey was conducted during the Long March and over a two week period. That could have weighed things in the PML-N’s and pro-judiciary crowd’s favor. But then you have the no dharna factor also. So the survey was conducted during a two week period that included the build up to the Long March, its climax, and the disappointment.

    I have not heard of the local company that conducted the polling. I wrongly assumed it was Gallup Pakistan or AC Nielsen Pakistan — but it’s another company.

    A little Orientalist in approach? I would have to disagree there. It’s not an anthropological study making cultural assumptions. It’s a study of public opinion. The sponsoring organization in Western, but it seems as if the group that conducted the survey is local. Moreover, it’s the same type of thing you’d see in the US regarding the elections, etc.

    I would say this series of surveys are counter-orientalist as they provide a means to understand shifts and divisions within Pakistani public opinion. An Orientalist approach would assume uniformity of thought and static sentiments rooted in unchanging culture and traditions.

  4. Public opinion has drastically changed since the Long March. Now, the front pages of newspapers and the lead items on TV news stations are invariably linked to the economic or security crisis in the country. With petrol and food prices rising at the rate they are, and constant and daily loadshedding, the judges issue has been pushed back, at least temporarily, by more day-to-day concerns. Being in Pakistan right now has really driven that fact home to me.

Leave a Reply