Rich and John’s Unexcellent Adventure
SORRY, I KNOW WE CAME A BIT EARLY
The big story in Pakistan today was not the swearing in of the new prime minister, but the arrival of Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte and Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher. Their two day visit to Pakistan, coming in the midst of a political transition there and prior to the formation of a cabinet, reflects a sense of urgency in Washington and a desire to influence, if not determine, the makeup and policy positions of the incoming government. Their eagerness has been received in Pakistan as overaggressiveness and was widely criticized.
DOING THE ROUNDS
Today, Negroponte and Boucher met with President Pervez Musharraf, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ashfaq Kayani, soon to be outgoing Inter-Services Intelligence Chief Lt. Gen. Nadeem Taj, and Foreign Secretary Riaz Mohammad Khan. They also met with National Assembly Speaker Fehmida Mirza, People’s Party Co-Chairman Asif Zardari and, seemingly for the first time, Muslim League-Nawaz leader Nawaz Sharif.
Accompanying Zardari was probable foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi and Hussain Haqqani, an adviser to the late Benazir Bhutto and fellow at the neoconservative Hudson Institute, who some speculate will be Pakistan’s next ambassador to the United States. [The PML-N's Ishaq Dar will likely have the unenviable post of finance minister.]
Haqqani met with Boucher a few weeks ago in Washington. He told the New York Times today, “It is clear that the United States recognizes that there is a substantive change of political actors on the Pakistani stage…there is a new sheriff in town…There is a new political order in Pakistan, and Americans have realized that they have perhaps talked with one man for too long and now there is a new political team.” Ahmed Mukhtar, a senior PPP legislator, seemed to emphasize the need for continuity in Pakistan’s foreign policy.
Neither Negroponte nor Boucher spoke to the media after their meetings, reflecting the former’s refrain that the U.S. seeks a long-term relationship with Pakistan.
Sharif, however, provided a mouthful to the Pakistani press. He said he told the senior American diplomats that the time for a one man show in Pakistan has come to an end, the nation’s foreign policy will be produced after parliamentary debate, and that Pakistan won’t become a “killing field” for a U.S. war. Indicating that Pakistan’s foreign policy will change, Sharif also stated that the Pakistani people rejected Musharraf’s policies. He, however, did not provide any specifics of how those policies would change.
Seated with Sharif in the Negroponte-Boucher meeting was his brother, Shahbaz, potential finance minister Ishaq Dar, Nisar Ali Khan, Ahsan Iqbal, Khawaja Asif, and retired Ambassador Tariq Fatemi. The latter is a senior foreign policy adviser to Sharif and helped draft the PML-N’s election manifesto.
Tomorrow, Negroponte and Boucher will meet with lawyers’ movement leaders Aitzaz Ahsan and Tariq Mehmood, other civil society actors, and defense analyst Talat Masood.
HOW TO LOSE FRIENDS AND NOT INFLUENCE PEOPLE
The Negroponte-Boucher visit has been roundly criticized by political commentators and retired diplomats. Former Foreign Secretary Riaz Khokar described the meetings, which took place prior to the formation of a government in Islamabad and hours after the new prime minister was sworn in, as “typical American crude diplomacy” and “heavy handed” interference. He said that Britain or France would not behave similarly.
Some have suggested that Washington asked the PPP not give the PML-N the foreign ministry. Others have also claimed that Washington seeks the inclusion of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) into the governing coalition at the center, presumably as a “secular” party to balance out the PML-N. But if these potential developments do materialize, the PPP also has its own reasons for their realization.
Senior Pakistani journalist Nusrat Javed said that multiple sources have informed him that Negroponte asked Sharif to work with Musharraf as president for five years. Mariana Baabar, another leading Pakistani diplomatic journalist, stated that the Foreign Office in Pakistan asked the State Department to delay the visit until after the government was formed, but their wishes were ignored. However, both Khokhar and another Pakistani commentator, Shafqat Mahmood, opined that the Negroponte-Boucher visit could have been also at the behest of Musharraf.
In the end, the Negroponte-Boucher visit is yet another move by Washington that has widened the gap between it and Pakistan’s opinion shapers and general public.







I can understand politically active individuals like Aitzaz and Tariq Mehmood. But why Talat Masood?
I think they’re meeting with him for two reasons:
1- His opinion is respected by, and perhaps even sought by, senior political leaders, and I think, particularly those within the PPP.
2- He’s the major defense and political analyst on Pakistani television, especially on GEO. So you can perhaps shape Pakistani public opinion via him.
So in short, reaching out to Masood could have a multiplier effect whereby the U.S. perception of the war on terror could be indirectly impressed upon both elites and the general public.
I believe Mr. Nawaz will compromise on Judiciary issues and all civil society will stand alone without anyone’s help sad reality.
This visit is undertaken at the behest of Musharaff so that their asset cultivated with 10 billion dollars donot go waste.Americans must be ruing the day when they allowed DEMOCRACY to kick start in pakistan. But then they donot understand that it is Musharaff(ISI) who created TALIBAN in the first place with help from Saudi arabia and UAE but now gone out of control. They just donot have the stomach to pay a price for their mistakes.They will like India/Afghanistan to pay the price or pakistani people.
Nawaz has done the right thing by exposing the creation of Jalalabad as well as MMA creation. USA must pay the price for these mistakes done with their knowledge.
Pakistan must keep close watch on these manouveres because the price is FREEDOM
Thank you for your explanation! Ive written my response below.
1 – I suppose this makes sense if theyre concerned about the continuity of Pakistan’s security policy.
2 – I have some doubts about this one. Mr Masood is strongly liberal and likely to be on the right side of the fence as far as they’re concerned anyway without much convincing. Plus if they were concerned about swinging public opinion through him (firstly thats a little optimistic) and secondly by meeting with him openly theyre only making it harder for him to put forward their case.
Anonymous, I agree that it’s a bit optimistic to believe that Talat Masood can significantly change Pakistani public opinion. But that’s not to say it won’t have any positive impact.
It’s important to note that he has no equivalent in the Pakistani public discourse. He’s carved a unique space for himself, and I think his status, combined with his liberal orientation, makes him someone useful in the eyes of the State Department’s public affairs bureau.
It’s a common tactic in public relations to use third party allies (TPA) to present one’s message. One, the legitimacy of the TPA can transfer on to the idea itself (it can also blow back and delegitimize the TPA). Two, using a TPA can also produce an “echo effect,” i.e. the impression that an idea is supported by a diverse lot of actors and not a single party.
As for the impact of publicly meeting with Masood, that’s a bit unclear. The meeting hasn’t been given much publicity. It was mentioned once yesterday. I haven’t heard it mentioned today. There’s even the possibility that it did not occur. But if it did, the news of the meeting might not be widespread enough to have an impact. Additionally, Masood’s own authoritativeness could supplant any perceptions of him advocating the talking points of a foreign country.